Three models, all base to base. They all have Hit the Deck! They are targeted with a POW12/7, AOE 2 attack, which directly hits one model. There are also two other models without Hit the Deck! within 2" of the model directly hit but more than 1" away.
The main guy directly hit would be knocked down but take no damage. The other two with HtD! would be completely unaffected.
The two models further away would take pow 7 blasts.
If the attack applied some effect like crater or continous fire the directly hit model and the two taking blast damage would also get that.
The rule text is kinda confusing as it is. First it tells me to ignore models with Hit the Deck! when determining which models would be hit by an AOE. Okay. Then it explains what happens to models with Hit the Deck! if they would be hit by an AOE.
In what situations would the “instead becomes knocked down” even happen if the rule first tells me to ignore those models?
This rule continues to cause confusion. Since we have nice infernal presence these days could @elswickchuck confirm that the interpretation eldrak made above is correct (or tell other interpretation)?
What exactly gets ignored by the instruction “Ignore a model with Hit the Deck! …” ?
The opening sentence can be understood as contradicting the second sentence:
The first sentence says “ignore this model”
The second sentence says “But if you would be hit, do this instead” – which could never be satisfied by a strict reading of the first sentence, because you ignore the model with Hit the Deck when determining who can be hit by AOEs.
So you target model with hit the deck and directly hut the model, instead it will be knocked down.
2 models with hit the deck are base to base with the model directly hit and 2 an inch away that do not have it
The 2 models not directly hit but with hit the deck rule are going to be ignored for determining who are hit next afrer the direct hit, thus causing the models without hit the deck to be the next eligible models
It just confuses a lot that nowhere in the rule “directly hit” is mentioned. But the interpretation clearly makes difference between hit and directly hit.